Save Our State  

Go Back   Save Our State > General Forum (non official Save Our State business) > Elections, Politics, and Partisanship

Elections, Politics, and Partisanship Topics relating to politics, elections, or party affiliations of interests to SOS associates

WELCOME BACK!.............NEW EFFORTS AHEAD..........CHECK BACK SOON.........UPDATE YOUR EMAIL FOR NEW NOTIFICATIONS.........
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-19-2010, 04:52 PM
Mikell's Avatar
Mikell Mikell is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 77
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Twoller View Post
When the article says "federal government", I wonder who they are talking about. It doesn't make sense that any part of the federal government should have a monopoly on enforcing federal law since we states are all bound together by the constitution from whence all federal law extends.

What about the Drug War as an example? The DEA enforces the Drug War, but that in no way prevents states from enacting their own laws against drug use.
Well said Twoller!
__________________
No Fate
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-19-2010, 05:35 PM
John M. from Mass.'s Avatar
John M. from Mass. John M. from Mass. is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Boston Taxachusetts
Posts: 11
Default

Sheriff Joe Arpaio should be the logical choice to enforce this new ordinance.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-19-2010, 10:25 PM
MowMyOwn MowMyOwn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 165
Default

Here's the bill -

http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/04/16/AzSB1070.pdf
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SaveOurState ©2009 - 2016 All Rights Reserved