Steve Poizner's Ad Touts Tough Immigration Line

[Twoller]

Originally Posted by Jeanfromfillmore

....

In seeking to differentiate himself from Whitman, Poizner has argued he's more conservative and has promised to take on an issue that has bedeviled the state for years. Population estimates vary, but it's believed that 2 million to 3 million illegal immigrants live in California.

Whitman has said she opposes cutting off health care or education for children who have come to the country illegally, and she has accused Poizner of changing positions on illegal immigration in recent years.

Poizner's remarks have echoed the 1994 debate over Proposition 187, which denied publicly funded social services to illegal immigrants. A federal court later found the law's provisions unconstitutional.

....

Neither Poizner nor Whitman have taken a stand on anchor baby citizenship, which is the more important part of confronting benefits to illegal immigrants. Citizenship to their offspring is the single most corrupting benefit that illegal immigrants fraudulently collect. Unless Poizner is willing to say that he will cut off benefits to the children of illegal immigrants, then he is no improvement over Whitman.

[Ayatollahgondola]

Originally Posted by Twoller

Unless Poizner is willing to say that he will cut off benefits to the children of illegal immigrants, then he is no improvement over Whitman.

So you are saying that it's all or nothing for every candidate?

[Twoller]

Originally Posted by Ayatollahgondola

So you are saying that it's all or nothing for every candidate?

All I am saying is what I posted above. Nothing more, nothing less.

[Jeanfromfillmore]

Originally Posted by Twoller

All I am saying is what I posted above. Nothing more, nothing less.

You would argue with an ant, if it wasn't going the direction you wanted!

[MowMyOwn]

Originally Posted by Jeanfromfillmore

You would argue with an ant, if it wasn't going the direction you wanted!

You got that right!

[PochoPatriot]

Originally Posted by Twoller

Neither Poizner nor Whitman have taken a stand on anchor baby citizenship, which is the more important part of confronting benefits to illegal immigrants.

What do you want them to do? Secede from the Union? Birth right citizenship IS the law. There is nothing, apart from a Constitutional amendment that can change that law.

Damn, it is all or nothing with some of you! We have to learn what hills we want to die on, and birthright citizenship is not the hill...not yet, any way.