OK,
The law says thou shall not drive while inebriated.
It also says thou shall have a license of the appropriate classification for the vehicle being driven.
It applies whether one is a resident of Maywood or Hollywood Hills.
The article alleges racism due to the fact that more people are found driving without a license than driving while inebriated in certain neighborhoods.
And the point is? If it were me, the white guy, there would probably be more legal ramifications and consequences than a mere walk home. And to tow the vehicle of an unlicensed driver stopped in a certain part of town is racist?
I've also seen mothers with children removing stuff from the trunk before the walk. It strikes at my protectional instinct as a man, but what is the real difference? The driver was AN UNLICENSED DRIVER IN VIOLATION OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE.
__________________
Freibier gab's gestern
Hay burros en el maiz
RAP IS TO MUSIC WHAT ETCH-A-SKETCH IS TO ART
Don't drink and post. 
"A nickel will get you on the subway, but garlic will get you a seat." - Old New York Yiddish Saying
"You can observe a lot just by watching." Yogi Berra
Old journeyman commenting on young apprentices - "Think about it, these are their old days"
SOMETIMES IT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.
Never, ever, wear a bright colored shirt to a stand up comedy show.
|