I'm going to red flag this bit of legislation. Look what he's trying to do:
Quote:
BILL ANALYSIS
AB 620
Page 1
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
AB 620 (John A. Perez)
As Amended July 23, 2009
Majority vote
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|ASSEMBLY: |66-4 |(May 18, 2009) |SENATE: |35-0 |(September 1, |
| | | | | |2009) |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Original Committee Reference: B. & P.
SUMMARY : Establishes new minimum size requirements and other
changes to identification cards for a specified class of
registered professionals.
The Senate amendments delete the requirement that the
application for registration of a natural person as a
professional photocopier to be signed by the applicant under
penalty of perjury, and instead:
1)Requires the application for registration of a natural person
as a professional photocopier to be certified to be true.
2)Provides that a person or entity that knowingly provides false
information is subject to a civil penalty of a minimum amount
of $2,500 and a maximum amount of $25,000 for each violation.
AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY , this bill was substantially similar
to the version approved by the Senate.
FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations
Committee, there are no significant costs associated with this
legislation.
COMMENTS : This bill, as amended in the Senate, is non-fiscal,
requires the application for registration of a natural person as
a professional photocopier to be certified to be true, and
includes civil penalties.
Analysis Prepared by : Joanna Gin / B. & P. / (916) 319-3301
FN: 0002316
|
So he wants to decriminalize someone who makes a false statement while applying to become an official records photocopier. Anyone want to guess who would benefit from this?