Save Our State  

Go Back   Save Our State > Priority Topics Section > Immigration

Immigration Topics relating to the subject of US Immigration

WELCOME BACK!.............NEW EFFORTS AHEAD..........CHECK BACK SOON.........UPDATE YOUR EMAIL FOR NEW NOTIFICATIONS.........
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2  
Old 11-26-2009, 08:32 AM
Twoller Twoller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,296
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeanfromfillmore View Post
....

The Obama administration is committed to making a major push early next year. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano ... insisted now is the time to put together the elements of what she called the three-legged stool: tough enforcement, a much streamlined system for legal immigration and a path to legal status for illegal immigrants already in the U.S.

....

There are ways to compromise on these matters. A good start is a new Brookings Institution/Duke University study. It calls for ... a big increase for legal immigrants with needed work skills. ...
The public reactions against amnesty are pretty vital, but the discussion over legal immigration is still heavily clouded. Is it hard to see that increased legal immigration would be worse than amnesty? It would be better to offer an amnesty along with a comprehensive and long term strategy to purge, utterly, illegal immigrants along with a moratorium on legal immigration until that goal is met. Making it easier to immigrate to the US is just another kind of amnesty and if you offer amnesty along with easier immigration, then that's just laying the foundation of another amnesty further down the road. If it is easier to immigrate legally, then it is also harder to violate immigration laws and so illegal immigration has all that much motivation -- the legal reaction is softened and seeing two amnesties from both a Republican and Democratic presidency creates the promise of third.

This is what Reagan should have done instead of posing workplace enforcement as a counterbalance to the amnesty he gave. He should have commited to hunting down all the rest of the illegals after the end of the period of amnesty and clamped down on legal immigration as well until we could say that the country was really free of illegal immigrants.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SaveOurState ©2009 - 2016 All Rights Reserved