Save Our State  

Go Back   Save Our State > General Forum (non official Save Our State business) > United States Federal government

United States Federal government Topics and information relating to the federal government of interest to SOS associates

WELCOME BACK!.............NEW EFFORTS AHEAD..........CHECK BACK SOON.........UPDATE YOUR EMAIL FOR NEW NOTIFICATIONS.........
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-19-2009, 10:07 AM
ilbegone's Avatar
ilbegone ilbegone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,068
Default States sue US for decades of bond money

States sue US for decades of bond money

Quote:
Unclaimed funds now exceed $16B and date to WWII

By Matt Gouras
The Associated Press
Tucson, Arizona | Published: 10.19.2009

HELENA, Mont. — The federal government is facing a lawsuit over billions in unclaimed bonds that date back to the patriotic fundraising efforts of World War II, leading to a showdown between states that say they should be given the money and a Treasury Department that claims ownership.

World War II sparked an unprecedented bond-buying drive, spurred on by one of the largest advertising campaigns ever seen — a push wrapped in dutiful pleas from celebrities, politicians and cartoon characters alike.
Most American families bought at least one bond at the time, and many never cashed them in — thanks in part to a 40-year maturity in the bonds. And those same "Series E" war bonds continued to be sold by the federal government until 1980.

More than $16 billion worth of the bonds are unclaimed, either lost or forgotten about with the death of the original purchasers.

The state attorneys general suing the Treasury Department contend that the federal government made no effort to find those people. They want the money given to the states, which have a legal system in place for finding the owners of unclaimed funds.

"It's better for the millions of Americans who are the rightful owners to have it returned to the states, because the states will make a real effort to find them," said David Bishop, a partner at Kirby McInerney, which is representing the states in the suit. "And if after searching for them, they can't find them, the money can go to work in the communities where the bonds were purchased."

The Treasury Department counters that it, indeed, tries to find owners of the unclaimed bonds, and says it has a Web site where people can simply type in their Social Security number to see if they have one. And it points out that the money is not just lying around somewhere.

"One of the misunderstandings out there is that there is a lot of cash sitting somewhere in a drawer. Money from savings bonds was used to run the daily operating expenses of the government," said Joyce Harris, with the Bureau of the Public Debt. "These are obligations of the federal government, not the states. There is no pot of gold out there just waiting for someone to grab it."
The Treasury also points out that most of the unclaimed bonds are far more recent than the original World War II-era bonds. And overall, 99 percent of people claim their bonds.

And those who don't cash them often choose to do so for tax reasons, or perhaps out of a sense of patriotism, Harris said.

"Quite frankly, people are aware of the bonds," she said. "A majority, when you contact them, are aware of the bonds."

It's not like the states will get the money free of obligation, about $55 million in the case of Montana. The states would be obligated to pay bond holders no matter if it takes them decades — or longer — to show up. In the meantime, though, states usually earmark the interest earned on such unclaimed money for schools or other purposes.

Steve Bullock, the attorney general for Montana, said states — not the federal government — have legally been granted the right to deal with unclaimed money.

The complaint was first filed in federal court in New Jersey in 2004 with New Jersey and North Carolina as the plaintiffs. Montana, Kentucky, Oklahoma and Missouri later joined the case. All states would benefit if the lawsuit is successful.

The case will come down to constitutional arguments. Attorneys for the federal government are arguing the states don't have standing on what they see as a contract issue between the original purchasers and the Treasury Department.

The states expect arguments in the case to be made later this year on a motion from the federal government to dismiss the case.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SaveOurState ©2009 - 2016 All Rights Reserved