|
Elections, Politics, and Partisanship Topics relating to politics, elections, or party affiliations of interests to SOS associates |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Arizona must be on Mexican drugs.. re-electing McClown just boggles my mind..
I hope someone over there can explain wtf they are doing there regarding who they vote for and why?? WTF?? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Once again, term limits is what is missing here. And also, the primary system. This is a primary election that McCain has won, right? It's easy to miss and the fact that some Democrat was running at the same time confused the whole race.
Get the political parties off the public election gravy train. Take out the party affiliations of voter registration records. Make it a federal crime to ask what your party affiliation is for purposes of voter registration. If Arizona Republicans had made the decision to pick a nominee in the private elections of the Arizona Republican party, would McCain still have made the nomination? How many terms has this little rat served? If there had been term limits, how many different Republicans might have had a chance to make a contribution? Maybe even some Democrats might have done something good, who knows?
__________________
The United States of America is for citizens only! Everyone else OUT.
Criminalize asking party affilation for voter registration! End the "two party system"! Last edited by Twoller; 08-25-2010 at 07:51 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I don't think it's a problem for the parties to have primaries, but I don't see why that should preclude a candidate from being on the ballot because they lost a primary. Why shouldn't everyone have a chance to vote for every candidate? The claim is that it makes for a confusing ballot when multiple candidates from the same party compete in a general election, but I don't see why that should be reason enough to withhold a candidate after having gone through all the necessary steps to obtain status.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Term limits got rid of the Willie Brown political machine in California, but greatly contributed to the problems we have now.
"Legislators" who won't talk to each other and shaft one another at every opportunity, are deaf to the populace and are happy to "solve" the budget crisis by allowing California to nosedive into irreparable financial doom, and waste time on insignificant pet legislation which harms employment when we need jobs most. Maybe term limits would work every half generation to clean out the rats and snakes, but having career politicians on permanent lame duck status in every elected position they temporarily occupy is hardly productive. And I'm not really wild about our new open primary as it has been created, I'm sure it can be manipulated to our collective harm. There may be merit in being registered as "voters" rather than as party members. At least twice to my recollection my Independent registration has been changed to another party - once from independent to Republican and most recently I have been changed from independent to Democrat. This last primary I wasted no time in paying back the Democrats for fraudulently changing my registration by placing a vote for every loser on the democratic ticket I could, and wrote in a few like Francis the Talking Mule and Mr. Ed as part of the "minority" ticket. Friggin' Jackasses.
__________________
Freibier gab's gestern Hay burros en el maiz RAP IS TO MUSIC WHAT ETCH-A-SKETCH IS TO ART Don't drink and post. "A nickel will get you on the subway, but garlic will get you a seat." - Old New York Yiddish Saying "You can observe a lot just by watching." Yogi Berra Old journeyman commenting on young apprentices - "Think about it, these are their old days" SOMETIMES IT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. Never, ever, wear a bright colored shirt to a stand up comedy show. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The reason that everyone should not have a chance to vote on every candidate in a primary is precisely because a nominee for the primary is strictly an affair for members of a political party. The Republicans have nothing to say about who is nominated for the Democrats and the Democrats have nothing to say about who is nominated for the Republicans. This is how bad the "two party system" has gotten. We have people unable to distinguish what the primary elections are even about. This is why reforming them with "open primaries" where everyone can vote for any of the candidates in the primary is completely insane. It makes no sense whatsoever. We already have an election following the primary where people can vote for whoever they want outside of the political parties. This is the election following the primary where the whole purpose of the primary election is supposed to be fulfilled and the nominees run for the actual office. It is even possible that there be a candidate in this race who never even showed up in the primaries. There is no legal requirement anywhere in the United States that says a political party must participate in any primary election. Furthermore, it is not even necessary for anyone running for office to belong to a political party at all. This is how ridiculous the notion of an "open primary" is. In the last primary election last June here in California, a proposition passed to run "open primaries". It is a legal absurdity and one wonders how it even made it to the ballot. Quote:
But yes, there is a connection between the political primary system and the "two party system". They are two heads of the same monster that has taken over government throughout the US. Get rid of the two party system. Term limits for all federally elected officials, at least, and criminalize recording party affiliation for purposes of voter registration. It will work.
__________________
The United States of America is for citizens only! Everyone else OUT.
Criminalize asking party affilation for voter registration! End the "two party system"! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
It would be pretty hard to get rid of the two major party system without putting some mechanisim in place for preventing people from voting to one of the two major parties.
I think ending the closed party system will be on the ballot in November so we'll see how many people forgot why we put in a closed party system in the first place. Since most people vote for one of the two major parties, and you can't stop that from happening, an open primary assures that the weakest and most ill qualified win the primary for that party. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
You have completely missed the above discussion. It doesn't matter whether people vote for one of the two major parties. The problem is not the two major parties, it is the monopoly that the two parties, the "two party system" has on our government. The "two party system" is confusing itself with government and so is the public. Open primaries is an absurdity that further entrenches the "two party system".
__________________
The United States of America is for citizens only! Everyone else OUT.
Criminalize asking party affilation for voter registration! End the "two party system"! |
|
|