|
|||||||
| The Judicial Branch Topics and information of interest to SOS associates in relation to courts, law, and justice |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
02-16-2010, 07:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
OK,
The law says thou shall not drive while inebriated. It also says thou shall have a license of the appropriate classification for the vehicle being driven. It applies whether one is a resident of Maywood or Hollywood Hills. The article alleges racism due to the fact that more people are found driving without a license than driving while inebriated in certain neighborhoods. And the point is? If it were me, the white guy, there would probably be more legal ramifications and consequences than a mere walk home. And to tow the vehicle of an unlicensed driver stopped in a certain part of town is racist? I've also seen mothers with children removing stuff from the trunk before the walk. It strikes at my protectional instinct as a man, but what is the real difference? The driver was AN UNLICENSED DRIVER IN VIOLATION OF THE CALIFORNIA VEHICLE CODE.
__________________
Freibier gab's gestern Hay burros en el maiz RAP IS TO MUSIC WHAT ETCH-A-SKETCH IS TO ART Don't drink and post.  "A nickel will get you on the subway, but garlic will get you a seat." - Old New York Yiddish Saying "You can observe a lot just by watching." Yogi Berra Old journeyman commenting on young apprentices - "Think about it, these are their old days" SOMETIMES IT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. Never, ever, wear a bright colored shirt to a stand up comedy show. 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode