|
State Government Issues of importance to SOS associates relating to their state government. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
He was born in Barstow, grew up in Los Angeles, and parded up with Villaraigosa in high school.
__________________
Freibier gab's gestern Hay burros en el maiz RAP IS TO MUSIC WHAT ETCH-A-SKETCH IS TO ART Don't drink and post. ![]() "A nickel will get you on the subway, but garlic will get you a seat." - Old New York Yiddish Saying "You can observe a lot just by watching." Yogi Berra Old journeyman commenting on young apprentices - "Think about it, these are their old days" SOMETIMES IT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. Never, ever, wear a bright colored shirt to a stand up comedy show. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is just hilarious:
Quote:
I don't understand why there is an effort to overturn 131 and nothing to overturn 353. Is that right about 1236? My understanding was that 1236 prevented mandatory use of E-verify. Can the state really ban the use of E-verify? That doesn't sound right. I'm all for mandatory E-verify.
__________________
The United States of America is for citizens only! Everyone else OUT.
Criminalize asking party affilation for voter registration! End the "two party system"! |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
131 is a simple idea to grasp. Give illegals free education at the expense of legal citizens. And it aids and abets illegal aliens at taxpayer expense. It also allows our state government to sanction the breaking of federal laws. In addition, 131 has taken the biggest advertisement share, and that is something to be taken advantage of The everify bills are not that well known. Plus they are complicated. The E-verify bill that Brown signed only prevents cities and counties from mandating E-verify use by their contractors, thus would only affect those municipalities who would be willing to use it. Not that many really. Not yet anyway. So 131 was the logical, most effective choice to recall. |
![]() |
|
|