Save Our State  

Go Back   Save Our State > General Forum (non official Save Our State business) > The Judicial Branch

The Judicial Branch Topics and information of interest to SOS associates in relation to courts, law, and justice

WELCOME BACK!.............NEW EFFORTS AHEAD..........CHECK BACK SOON.........UPDATE YOUR EMAIL FOR NEW NOTIFICATIONS.........
 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7  
Old 06-07-2011, 09:57 AM
LAPhil LAPhil is offline
Continent Thief
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Tralfamador
Posts: 454
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayatollahgondola View Post
Well, it's just propaganda. The court didn't take the case up. Why, they didn't say. It may bolster granting in state tuition in other states, but it does not have to. The previous rulings just said it was in line with California law. Other states are not restricted by California law
Look, I know the L.A. Times is pretty biased, but I don't think they would just make up a story out of whole cloth. It does look like they were wrong, but I'm wondering where they got their information from. I hope they print a retraction when the truth comes out.
__________________
OPEN BORDERS AND MASS AMNESTY

Ich Bin Ein Arizonan!

"I entirely reject the concept, however, of "anchor babies." If parents are found to be here illegally, then the whole family, children as well, should be sent back to the parents' country of origin."

Last edited by LAPhil; 06-07-2011 at 10:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SaveOurState ©2009 - 2016 All Rights Reserved