500 Support KKK Anti-Immigrant Rally in GA

[Twoller]

Originally Posted by Don

If you believe in equality for all races then you must really be furious that the local head of the NAACP can threaten white people with destruction of their livelihoods for openly exercising free speech rights that are routinely exercised by Blacks and Hispanics, in advancing Black and Hispanic racial interests.

I'm certainly glad you believe that no race should be subject to another and that whites should not be subject to Black veto power in the exercise of their free speech rights.

Well, twice now you accuse the NAACP of threatening people, but you have not cited anything like evidence that this is occuring. I don't think you even really believe that the NAACP actually threatened anyone, you are just posing the NAACP as threatening those who attended the Klan artificially -- and I think I am being generous when I say "artificially".

Originally Posted by Don

... Here's what the local paper said:

"He [Mayor Jacobs] said City Hall received more than 1,000 calls from as far as California asking for information about the rally. “Some wanted to be part of it,” he said.

Gary Moore, chairman of the Appling County NAACP, said he thought more local Klan supporters would have attended, except it would damage their position in their communities.

“You’ve got a lot of closet people — businesspeople, doctors, lawyers, judges — that aren’t going to jeopardize their livelihoods,” he said."


Straight from the horse's mouth: If white people exercise their free speech rights, the NAACP will go after their "livelihoods." Can you imagine the outcry if whites threatened to "jeopardize" the "livelihoods" of Blacks and Mexicans for exercising 1st Amendment rights? In the Racial Caste System of modern America, whites are on the bottom and blacks and Mexicans do not hesitate to brag about their privileged, protected status as the nation's most favored races who have veto power over lowly, "inbred, rednecked" whites.

In making my estimate, which is admittedly speculative, I relied in part on the statements of the chairman of the NAACP, who refers to "closet" racists in business, the professions and even the judiciary .According to the chairman of the NAACP, the area is loaded with "closet" white racists who keep their mouths shut because they know what's good for them.

You are completely misquoting Gary Moore, who was suggesting fear of embarrassment, not violence.

The idea that the NAACP might be capable of threatening attendees of a Klan meeting is pretty weak. More like the other way around isn't it? Especially with the record of the KKK. But if we were to reflect on your accusation, we might imagine that it was actually inciting attendees to a similar artificial defensive pose, falsely assuming that the NAACP might actually weild some kind of aggression against them. It might even suggest something preemptive against the NAACP as a "defensive" measure. But I won't presume to actually make such an accusation on a few posts here, even though such posturing is not uncommon among terrorists and their sympathizers.

[usa today]

Actually its another group "the color of change" I believe that is going after Glenn Beck

And we all know several raza groups got Dobbs kicked off

So yes , it is happening

[Don]

Originally Posted by Twoller

Well, twice now you accuse the NAACP of threatening people, but you have not cited anything like evidence that this is occuring. I don't think you even really believe that the NAACP actually threatened anyone, you are just posing the NAACP as threatening those who attended the Klan artificially -- and I think I am being generous when I say "artificially".



You are completely misquoting Gary Moore, who was suggesting fear of embarrassment, not violence.

The idea that the NAACP might be capable of threatening attendees of a Klan meeting is pretty weak. More like the other way around isn't it? Especially with the record of the KKK. But if we were to reflect on your accusation, we might imagine that it was actually inciting attendees to a similar artificial defensive pose, falsely assuming that the NAACP might actually weild some kind of aggression against them. It might even suggest something preemptive against the NAACP as a "defensive" measure. But I won't presume to actually make such an accusation on a few posts here, even though such posturing is not uncommon among terrorists and their sympathizers.

Our affirmative action Kenyan president used to represent an organization called ACORN. A favorite ACORN tactic was deploying mobs of "activists" to the homes of dirty rotten white racist bank employees and terrorizing their families until the banks agreed to make loans to "minorities." They did.

The four Duke University students falsely accused of raping the black hooker several years ago were repeatedly threatened with violence and even threatened with castration by one of the "liberal" and "tolerant" Duke faculty members. Negros and their sympathizers used to come to the fraternity house and "demonstrate" and yell and scream threats. A Negro professor at Duke U sent an email to the Duke LaCrosse team Coach threatening rape of the coach's teen age daughter. Read his book about this incident, "It's Not About the Truth."

Remember the Central Park Jogger? The white woman who was raped and almost beaten to death for the amusement of a mob of "minorities"? She testified at their criminal trial under heavy police guard and escort to protect her from frothing mobs of black civil rights "activists" who swarmed all over the courthouse and yelled obscenities and threats against her. She was almost in as much danger at the court house as in Central Park on the night of the attack.

If white mobs threatened any black person or black family or showed up at a courthouse to harrass and intimidate black crime victims or witnesses, the US Army, National Guard and Federal Marshals would be deployed to protect them.

Many of the people on this site have been intimidated by minority thugs. I read that "Jeanfromfilmore" will not release her real name when interviewed by the press. Gee! I wonder why? Do you think she's afraid of the KKK?

[ilbegone]

Originally Posted by Don

The issue is not supporting the KKK.

The issue is that two years ago 5 people would not have shown up to publicly support the KKK.There is tremendous pressure on white people to just shut the hell up.

Now 500 whites show up in broad daylight at a public rally? If 500 show up in public, that means at least ten times that many support them in private. It means people are REALLY getting sick of Mexicans in a major way.

KKK members and their supporters can rot in hell as far as I'm concerned.

"Five hundred whites". Why not five hundred Americans show up concerning meaningful enforcement of our immigration laws, regardless of race?

Which has the strongest hand, "whites" or "Americans"? We're not talking rocket science here, I can't understand how some people won't see the forest for the trees.

[Jeanfromfillmore]

Every time I come on to the board I see this thread, and well, it kind of bothers me. I just want to remind everyone that we have rules and guidelines. If this thread continues to go down hill I will close it. Not because I agree or disagree with anything that is being discussed, but because it has already started to degrade. But I will in the strongest terms possible remind all of you that we have members who are of all skin color, religion and makeup. Keep that in mind when discussing such topics, and remember there's more than one point of view on any topic.

[DerailAmnesty.com]

He [Mayor Jacobs] said City Hall received more than 1,000 calls from as far as California asking for information about the rally. “Some wanted to be part of it,” he said.

Gary Moore, chairman of the Appling County NAACP, said he thought more local Klan supporters would have attended, except it would damage their position in their communities.

“You’ve got a lot of closet people — businesspeople, doctors, lawyers, judges — that aren’t going to jeopardize their livelihoods,” he said."



Straight from the horse's mouth: If white people exercise their free speech rights, the NAACP will go after their "livelihoods."



Interesting assertion, Don. Here's your problem. Based upon the record you've presented, the NAACP didn't threaten any action against the white folk's livelihoods.