Ordinarily I stay a bit away from racial issues, but when the reverse type discrimination comes into play, I think we have to monitor it, and this is an example.
This woman is claiming the NAACP is discriminating in their hiring practices, and retaliating against her for disclosing it:
Quote:
Case No.:34-2012-00124832
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES UNLAWFUL
HARASSMENT AND DISCRIMINATION
IN VIOLATION OF FEHA
JURY TRIAL IS DEMANDED
TIFFANY BRYAN,
P l a i n t i f f ,
Defendants
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE
ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE
(NAACP), SACRAMENTO, and DOES
1-20, i n c l u s i v e.
P l a i n t i f f
TIFFANY BRYAN ( h e r e i n a f t e r "BRYAN" or " P l a i n t i f f)
hereby demands a t r i a l by j u r y and alleges:
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
1. P l a i n t i f f is and at a l l times mentioned was, an
i n d i v i d u a l , with her p r i n c i p l e place of residence w i t h i n the
County of Sacramento. At a l l times relevant hereto. P l a i n t i ff
was employed with the Sacramento Chapter of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE ( h e r e i n a f t er
"NAACP" or "Defendant").
Beginning i n o r around October 2011, and continuing
through on or about November 19, 2011, Defendants, and each of
them, took demeaning actions towards P l a i n t i f f , s p e c i f i c a l l y,
without l i m i t a t i o n , discriminating against and harassing
P l a i n t i f f because of her having questioned the d i s c r i m i n a t o ry
recruitment practices of the NAACP.
10. Beginning i n or about October 2011, and continuing
through on or about November 19, 2011, Defendants, and each of
them, engaged i n actions w i t h the i n t e n t of harassing and r e t a l i a t i n g against and harassing P l a i n t i f f on account of her
having questioned the recruitment practices of the NAACP a f t er
being t o l d that a senior employee h i r e s only African-Americans,
and does not post job openings online, because online job
postings would necessitate giving persons of every race an-
"equal opportunity."
11. After questioning the h i r i n g practices of the NAACP,
P l a i n t i f f was harassed and experienced r e t a l i a t i o n i n several
ways, including, but not l i m i t e d to, being denied employment
o p p o r t u n i t i e s and
12. P l a i n t i f f ' s employment w i t h Defendant was terminated
on November 19, 2011 i n r e t a l i a t i o n f o r her challenging the
d i s c r i m i n a t o r y recruitment practices of the NAACP.
|
I see these types of cases of slight interest because La Raza pulls the same stunts all the time, and it pains me to see them get away with it.