View Single Post
  #5  
Old 04-30-2013, 11:34 AM
Ayatollahgondola's Avatar
Ayatollahgondola Ayatollahgondola is offline
SOS Associate
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,057
Default

Update:


Quote:
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION:
The California Employment Law Council (CELC), representing management lawyers in labor and employment matters, argues in opposition:
"While there is a legitimate policy question about the activities delineated, one major problem with AB 263 is that the bill essentially provides a 'two strikes and you are out' penalty for violations. The bill would require courts to permanently revoke all licenses possessed by the business for second or subsequent violations of unfair immigration-related practices, except for professional licenses. This would appear to require a court, for example, to permanently revoke applicable business licenses for two violations by a rogue supervisor of a large employer, permanently putting the business out of operation at a given location.
We pledge to work with the author to address concerns about unfair immigration practices with employers, but the provisions of AB 263 are vastly overbroad and could threaten the operation of responsible businesses."
A group calling itself Save our State argues that the bill "is being offered in a disguised attempt to dissuade employers from reporting illegal aliens to ICE or other federal immigration authorities." This group concludes, "California's people and businesses shall retain their rights to report crime, and the legislature shall make no law infringing upon the right to freely speak, and especially so, to access law enforcement on matters of their choosing without fear of reprisal."
Reply With Quote