Quote:
Originally Posted by LAPhil
A non-citizen resident is subject to the jurisdiction of the laws of the United States and if arrested they are entitled to a jury trial like any other resident, citizen or otherwise. A jury is ideally supposed to be composed of the peers of the defendant (which the Founding Fathers did believe in), and who better to fill the role of peer of a non-citizen than another non-citizen?
|
I anticipated the notion of judgement by peers, thus the question concerning a Muslim Chechen foreigner being judged in the United States by other middle eastern foreign Muslims - this notion of "social justice" is the stuff the parallel dimension minded United Nations is all about.
Besides, some cultures believe in arranged marriages with the bride being a child while the husband may be a middle aged man. Should a jury in the United States be composed of foreigners who came from the same child bride culture as a foreigner accused of child molestation?
But these are all side arguments which detract from the real issue -
national sovereignty.
To give foreigners the jury box is a big step towards giving foreigners who have no loyalty or sympathy for our country the ballot box.
__________________
Freibier gab's gestern
Hay burros en el maiz
RAP IS TO MUSIC WHAT ETCH-A-SKETCH IS TO ART
Don't drink and post.
"A nickel will get you on the subway, but garlic will get you a seat." -
Old New York Yiddish Saying
"You can observe a lot just by watching." Yogi Berra
Old journeyman commenting on young apprentices -
"Think about it, these are their old days"
SOMETIMES IT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.
Never, ever, wear a bright colored shirt to a stand up comedy show.