Save Our State

Save Our State (http://www.saveourstate.info/index.php)
-   General Discussion (http://www.saveourstate.info/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Aliens Sue Schwilk (http://www.saveourstate.info/showthread.php?t=1120)

Borderwatch 02-15-2010 06:00 PM

Comment
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by DerailAmnesty.com (Post 5499)
Schwilk keeps getting sued b/c he's asking for it. He shares a problem with Chelene Nightingale. Neither one knows when to shut up. I doubt this will slow down, it'll probably increase. He doesn't understand a good portion of the law and he invites litigation with his actions. Anyone w/ a first year Law student's understanding of libel/slander/defamation can take a look at the SDMM website and see that he's lucky he hasn't been named in about a half dozen additional suits.

I think he enjoys it. He feeds off the negative energy - some people do - and it gets his name in the paper.

4shadows 02-16-2010 02:11 AM

Ok, many dont like him for good reason, but is that enough not to support him at court in a show of force?

Rim05 02-16-2010 02:24 PM

Quote:

Ok, many dont like him for good reason, but is that enough not to support him at court in a show of force?
I am not sure I could support him because he is one of the 'gang' who called for boycotting SOS.info after the old SOS bit the dust. I cannot forget a sock in the kisser. I don't know any specific things he said but the SDMM did sign the pledge to not allow our SOS.info to be listed on their web site.

Jeanfromfillmore 02-16-2010 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rim05 (Post 5567)
I am not sure I could support him because he is one of the 'gang' who called for boycotting SOS.info after the old SOS bit the dust. I cannot forget a sock in the kisser. I don't know any specific things he said but the SDMM did sign the pledge to not allow our SOS.info to be listed on their web site.

Yes you're correct Rimo. It would amaze you at who is really working against the cause for their own egos and attempts to eat up others to be the biggest fish. We even have it here.

Rim05 02-16-2010 07:08 PM

Quote:

Yes you're correct Rimo. It would amaze you at who is really working against the cause for their own egos and attempts to eat up others to be the biggest fish. We even have it here.
I know what you are talking about, I have been doing a bit of investigating of my own.

PochoPatriot 02-16-2010 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4shadows (Post 5540)
Ok, many dont like him for good reason, but is that enough not to support him at court in a show of force?

Live by the boycott; die by the boycott. Let him wither on the vine and die, is my view.

Edited to add: Then again, what do I know, I am a liberal, lol!

4shadows 02-16-2010 09:32 PM

The problem with not backing him, as I see it, is that he is part of the movement and when one boycotts him well the rest is easy. I met him once at Patriot Point a few years ago, he was pleasant that day, I have no other dealings with him but I am looking for help in this area.

Ayatollahgondola 02-16-2010 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4shadows (Post 5603)
The problem with not backing him, as I see it, is that he is part of the movement and when one boycotts him well the rest is easy. I met him once at Patriot Point a few years ago, he was pleasant that day, I have no other dealings with him but I am looking for help in this area.

I've never met the guy, but he has sent me many threatening, caustic, or denigrating emails, in addition to posting me and DerailAmnesty.com on his website as men who tell lies, steal property, kick friendly dogs, etc...

Rim05 02-17-2010 04:15 AM

I have never met him but I have seen him at events so I know who he is. I am not going to name anyone but there were some at the old forum who banned AG and have been doing all they can against 'us' ever since AG started FightBackInSac. They will not have anything to do with us so I don't think they need my support in anything.

DerailAmnesty.com 02-17-2010 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 4shadows (Post 5603)
The problem with not backing him, as I see it, is that he is part of the movement and when one boycotts him well the rest is easy. I met him once at Patriot Point a few years ago, he was pleasant that day, I have no other dealings with him but I am looking for help in this area.

OK, but there's another side of that coin.

The problem with backing him is that you risk being associated with him. Not "associating" with him, being associated with him. Although Schwilk can speak well on occasion and he's not stupid, he carries some baggage. Off the top of my head, the biggest public miscues he authored were "Korean Kommie Ku--" and the exploding at the ladyfriend video incident. Those kinds of things harm you no matter what you're advocating on behalf of. Jeff has hurt himself via the internet and his enemies have used it masterfully to cripple his reputation.

From my perspective, he did SOS a favor when he removed us from his So. Cal Coalition list/website. It saved me from having to ask. There are public figures I like to see on my side of a debate and am happy to be lumped together with, and there are those I don't and I'm not.

Admittedly though, this is only a matter of opinion, and others here may view the situation and Schwilk differently.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright SaveOurState ©2009 - 2016 All Rights Reserved