PDA

View Full Version : Cost of teaching English learning students in SB County $34Million


Jeanfromfillmore
02-01-2010, 10:34 AM
This was in an email sent to me today by Robin

Cost of teaching English learning students in SB County $34Million
Stephen Wall, Staff Writer
Posted: 01/30/2010 02:59:01 PM PST

http://www.sbsun.com/search/ci_14302298?IADID=Search-www.sbsun.com-www.sbsun.com
San Bernardino County public schools are spending more than $34 million in state and federal money this school year to educate English learners, a group whose population has doubled since 1995.



That amount doesn't include additional funding for services and programs available to English learners as well as other students.


Fueled by skyrocketing immigration over the past 15 years, the growth is forcing school districts to make dramatic changes in the classroom.


Districts are making huge investments in teacher preparation and training, hiring bilingual aides and purchasing bilingual materials to help teachers handle the demographic shift.


Some are concerned about the need to focus limited resources on students who may be in the country illegally or whose parents are illegal immigrants. Federal law requires public schools to provide a free kindergarten through 12th grade education to all students regardless of immigration status.


"A lot of parents came here illegally with their children or had children born here. It's creating a huge burden on the state," said Assemblyman Steve Knight, R-Palmdale, whose district includes Victorville and the High Desert. "We have to have so many of these classes that it takes away from the core classes that I'd like to fund."


Gil Navarro, a member of the San Bernardino County board of education, said that immigrant students and English learners are not a drain on the educational system.


"I get tired of people complaining about English learners receiving lawful services when our school districts are just following federal laws," Navarro said. "Taxpayer money is being put to good use because the funding will provide an educated workforce."


More than one-in-five kindergarten through 12th grade students in the county public school system is an English learner, according to the state Department of Education. Five school districts have English learner enrollments of at least 25 percent. The overwhelming majority of English learners - 94 percent - identify Spanish as their first language.


"With the growth, we have had to relook at how we approach our English learners," said Martha Duenas, coordinator of the Department of English Learner Services for the Fontana Unified School District. Nearly four-in-10 Fontana Unified students is an English learner.


"It's a challenge for schools to meet the needs of English learners," said Bertha Arreguin, director of language support services for the Colton Joint Unified School District, where one-quarter of students are English learners.


Most English learners were born in the United States, but their parents came here during the immigration boom that started in the 1980s, intensified in the 1990s and continued through the last decade, according to the Pew Hispanic Center, a nonprofit research organization in Washington, D.C.


The school-age population in the United States, which now stands at about 53 million, is expected to reach 58 million by 2020.


More than 80 percent of that growth - about 4.5 million kids - will be the children of immigrant parents, the center projects.


Growing up in immigrant families where English is not spoken at home puts added pressure on schools to help students meet increasingly rigorous academic requirements.


"Nationally, schools and school districts are going to be faced with more and more students who will need English learner services," said Richard Fry, senior research associate at the center.


Locally, school districts receive three pots of state and federal money to specifically to educate students with limited English skills.


Districts get an average of $244 per student from the state in economic impact aid. They also receive about $95 per student in federal Title III funds for immigrant students. An additional $100 per student is available for pupils in grades four through eight from the state-funded English Language Acquisition Program.


The three funding sources total $34.4 million when multiplied the number of students in each category.


English learners often use other services such as free and reduced lunch programs that are not included in that cost, school officials say .


There are other pools of money that support English learners who receive special education, as well as English learners who are in the Gifted and Talented Education program.


"It's money well-spent because the majority of these students are U.S. citizens," said Lupe Andrade, director of English learner programs in the Rialto Unified School District, where nearly one-in-three students is an English learner.


"We want them to leave our educational system well-educated so they can contribute well to our economy," Andrade said. "Language shouldn't be a barrier to educating somebody."


While programs have their differences, many districts spend their English learner money in similar ways.


A large chunk is devoted to staff development to provide teachers with strategies to engage English learners. Administrators are also trained to identify the needs of English learners.


Many districts have teacher coaches specializing in English learner students who act as a resource for their colleagues and supplemental classroom supplies.


Districts also set aside time every day for intensive speaking, listening, reading and writing in English.


Officials say support systems are critical to help districts whose large numbers of English learner students are one reason for their low test scores.


"We've had good growth (in test scores) with English learners," said Daniel Arellano, director of English learner programs for the San Bernardino City Unified School District, which has a 33-percent English learner population.


"We're aren't anywhere near where we should be," Arellano said, "but we are much better than we were."


The Ontario-Montclair Unified School District, where nearly half the students are English learners, offers a newcomer class to help immigrant students get acclimated to this country.


"Our job is to educate students and take them from wherever they're at and move them forward," said Karla Wells, the district's director of academic accountability.


Critics say illegal immigration is breaking the state's bank and that illegal immigrants shouldn't get special services.


In 2004, California spent $7.7 billion to educate illegal immigrants and the U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants, according to a report from the Federation for American Immigration Reform, which supports strict limits on immigration.


"The costs are astronomical," said Raymond Herrera, founder and president of We The People California's Crusader, a Claremont-based anti-illegal immigration group. "American posterity is very much in peril. We can't go on this way."
English learner students in selected San Bernardino County school districts (2008-2009 school year):

* San Bernardino City Unified School District: 18,131 (33 percent of total students).

* Fontana Unified School District: 16,049 (39 percent of total).

* Ontario-Montclair Unified School District: 11,237 (49 percent of total).

* Rialto Unified School District: 8,486 (31 percent of total).

* Colton Joint Unified School District: 6,117 (25 percent of total).

* Source: California Department of Education

ilbegone
02-01-2010, 05:04 PM
a friend who works in one of the local schools told me tha the English Learners program is an exploitive scam to suck money into the school district.

There was a newspaper article probably from the Times or Daily news which described the program as a scam as well, by which administrators did a dis-service to the kids intentionally kept in the program long after they reached proficiency - they weren't being taught material they could comprehend. They were intentionally kept behind to justify revenue, as I understand it.

Gil Navarro strikes me as a combination of Gil Cedillo and a toned down Nativo Lopez...

ilbegone
02-01-2010, 05:11 PM
Here's that article:

LAUSD is selling out English Learners to fatten its finances


By Lance T. Izumi Lance T. Izumi is Koret Senior Fellow and senior director of Education Studies at the Pacific Research Institute and the co-author of the 2008 PRI report "English Immersion or Law Evasion: A 10th Anniversary Retrospective on Proposition

11/24/2009

IT recently emerged that many Los Angeles students placed in classes for English-language learners in the early elementary grades were still taking such classes when they entered high school. That's not a knock on the students, but a damning indictment of how government at all levels has sold them out and botched the delivery of English-language instruction.

A USC study found that nearly three out of 10 Los Angeles English-learner students spent years in English-language-instruction courses without ever being re-classified as English fluent. The study didn't address why administrators kept students in English-learner classes for so long. The reasons, however, are no mystery.

Many English learners actually score at the proficient level on the state test used to determine English fluency. In the Los Angeles school district, 45 percent of first-graders taking the 2008-09 test scored advanced or early advanced, the two levels signaling proficient English skills. The state says that scoring at these levels, plus the basic level on the state's English subject-matter test, is sufficient for a student to be re-classified as English fluent. Local school districts, however, are permitted to tack on their own requirements. Thus, Los Angeles also requires that students earn specified grades in subject-matter courses.

Even if students meet both state and local requirements for re-classification, a report by the Bureau of State Audits found many instances of students still not being re-classified as being fluent in English. An amazing 62 percent of students in the bureau's review met state and local criteria for fluent status, but weren't re-classified. This travesty is due in part to the perverse incentives for school districts to keep students classified as English learners and not move them on to English-fluent status.

The state Legislative Analyst's Office has found that districts have a financial incentive for keeping students classified as English learners because federal and state programs distribute funds based on the number of students eligible for those programs. In other words, the more students classified as English learners the more money districts receive from Washington and Sacramento.

Finally, keeping English-fluent students in the English-learner category helps schools meet the adequate-yearly-progress requirements for English learners under the No Child Left Behind act. NCLB requires subgroups such as English learners to make annual progress toward grade-level proficiency in math and English language arts. Keeping English-fluent students in the English-learner category increases the chances that schools will meet federal goals.

The California Department of Education has found that the probability of an English learner being re-classified as English fluent after 10 years in California schools is less than 40 percent. The department attributes this appalling situation to flawed re-classification methods "that likely under-represent success and ignore English learners' progress over time across the spectrum of linguistic and academic performance."

There are two ways to address this problem. One is to change the various laws that create the perverse incentives that keep students in the English-learner ghetto. Even if successful, however, such efforts would require a long and protracted struggle, stunting the academic growth of current English learners for many more years.

A better solution would be to give parents a school-choice voucher that would allow them and their children to exit immediately from public schools in Los Angeles and elsewhere that fail to transition students to English fluency quickly. Parents could then send their kids to private schools that better meet their demand for faster transitions.

The USC study found that students who moved out of English-learner classes by the third grade scored up to 40 points higher on standardized tests than students who remained in those classes. If the public schools want to imprison students in English-learner classes, then vouchers are the keys that could unlock those prison doors for parents and their children.

Jeanfromfillmore
02-01-2010, 11:10 PM
And as many of you know, I have a close friend who teaches ESL at a community college here in Ventura County. She has difficulty keeping her class open because of the low enrollment and has to leaflet at the Sunday Spanish Catholic service to try to draw in students. I spoke to another ESL teacher who said the same thing, and these classes are basically free.

Are we fools? Those teaching are not concerned with exposing this information because it would cost them their job, but it's costing so many other Americans their jobs with the budget cuts.