Ayatollahgondola
05-26-2012, 07:31 AM
Ordinarily I stay a bit away from racial issues, but when the reverse type discrimination comes into play, I think we have to monitor it, and this is an example.
This woman is claiming the NAACP is discriminating in their hiring practices, and retaliating against her for disclosing it:
Case No.:34-2012-00124832
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES UNLAWFUL
HARASSMENT AND DISCRIMINATION
IN VIOLATION OF FEHA
JURY TRIAL IS DEMANDED
TIFFANY BRYAN,
P l a i n t i f f ,
Defendants
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE
ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE
(NAACP), SACRAMENTO, and DOES
1-20, i n c l u s i v e.
P l a i n t i f f
TIFFANY BRYAN ( h e r e i n a f t e r "BRYAN" or " P l a i n t i f f)
hereby demands a t r i a l by j u r y and alleges:
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
1. P l a i n t i f f is and at a l l times mentioned was, an
i n d i v i d u a l , with her p r i n c i p l e place of residence w i t h i n the
County of Sacramento. At a l l times relevant hereto. P l a i n t i ff
was employed with the Sacramento Chapter of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE ( h e r e i n a f t er
"NAACP" or "Defendant").
Beginning i n o r around October 2011, and continuing
through on or about November 19, 2011, Defendants, and each of
them, took demeaning actions towards P l a i n t i f f , s p e c i f i c a l l y,
without l i m i t a t i o n , discriminating against and harassing
P l a i n t i f f because of her having questioned the d i s c r i m i n a t o ry
recruitment practices of the NAACP.
10. Beginning i n or about October 2011, and continuing
through on or about November 19, 2011, Defendants, and each of
them, engaged i n actions w i t h the i n t e n t of harassing and r e t a l i a t i n g against and harassing P l a i n t i f f on account of her
having questioned the recruitment practices of the NAACP a f t er
being t o l d that a senior employee h i r e s only African-Americans,
and does not post job openings online, because online job
postings would necessitate giving persons of every race an-
"equal opportunity."
11. After questioning the h i r i n g practices of the NAACP,
P l a i n t i f f was harassed and experienced r e t a l i a t i o n i n several
ways, including, but not l i m i t e d to, being denied employment
o p p o r t u n i t i e s and
12. P l a i n t i f f ' s employment w i t h Defendant was terminated
on November 19, 2011 i n r e t a l i a t i o n f o r her challenging the
d i s c r i m i n a t o r y recruitment practices of the NAACP.
I see these types of cases of slight interest because La Raza pulls the same stunts all the time, and it pains me to see them get away with it.
This woman is claiming the NAACP is discriminating in their hiring practices, and retaliating against her for disclosing it:
Case No.:34-2012-00124832
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES UNLAWFUL
HARASSMENT AND DISCRIMINATION
IN VIOLATION OF FEHA
JURY TRIAL IS DEMANDED
TIFFANY BRYAN,
P l a i n t i f f ,
Defendants
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE
ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE
(NAACP), SACRAMENTO, and DOES
1-20, i n c l u s i v e.
P l a i n t i f f
TIFFANY BRYAN ( h e r e i n a f t e r "BRYAN" or " P l a i n t i f f)
hereby demands a t r i a l by j u r y and alleges:
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
1. P l a i n t i f f is and at a l l times mentioned was, an
i n d i v i d u a l , with her p r i n c i p l e place of residence w i t h i n the
County of Sacramento. At a l l times relevant hereto. P l a i n t i ff
was employed with the Sacramento Chapter of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE ( h e r e i n a f t er
"NAACP" or "Defendant").
Beginning i n o r around October 2011, and continuing
through on or about November 19, 2011, Defendants, and each of
them, took demeaning actions towards P l a i n t i f f , s p e c i f i c a l l y,
without l i m i t a t i o n , discriminating against and harassing
P l a i n t i f f because of her having questioned the d i s c r i m i n a t o ry
recruitment practices of the NAACP.
10. Beginning i n or about October 2011, and continuing
through on or about November 19, 2011, Defendants, and each of
them, engaged i n actions w i t h the i n t e n t of harassing and r e t a l i a t i n g against and harassing P l a i n t i f f on account of her
having questioned the recruitment practices of the NAACP a f t er
being t o l d that a senior employee h i r e s only African-Americans,
and does not post job openings online, because online job
postings would necessitate giving persons of every race an-
"equal opportunity."
11. After questioning the h i r i n g practices of the NAACP,
P l a i n t i f f was harassed and experienced r e t a l i a t i o n i n several
ways, including, but not l i m i t e d to, being denied employment
o p p o r t u n i t i e s and
12. P l a i n t i f f ' s employment w i t h Defendant was terminated
on November 19, 2011 i n r e t a l i a t i o n f o r her challenging the
d i s c r i m i n a t o r y recruitment practices of the NAACP.
I see these types of cases of slight interest because La Raza pulls the same stunts all the time, and it pains me to see them get away with it.